Why split it? Because this is a relational database not a spreadsheet.
Are you design a spreadsheet or a relational database?TIP: If that is how you would do it in Excel (spreadsheet) then it is probably not the correct in a relational databass (Access).
The design you are describing may be done in a spreadsheet. Definitely not the way you would do it in a well designed a relational database. Because what you proposed would be a de-normalized design cause repeating fiedl and should NOT be done,
You do need a scores table. At the least each judges scores will be in a separate record. I am really thinking that probably each score should be a separate record.
The way I see it this:
Class/level (1) > has > (many) entries. each entry (1) >> has >> (many) judges. Each judge (1) >> has >> (many) scores.
Would it help if I create an example?
Boyd Trimmell aka Hitechcoach
Database Architect and Problem Solver
Microsoft MVP - Access Expert
25+ years specializing in Accounting, Inventory, and CRM systems
Started with Access 2.0.
"The good news about computers is that they do what you tell them to do. The bad news is that they do what you tell them to do."