Hi, I work with medical records and was given the task of merging 3 separate databases into a single Access file. I've been able to manipulate the databases so they are all formatted identically (albeit there are now a few "null"/non-applicable columns in many of the rows, but that's ok) and I've successfully imported and appended all of the files creating one long list of data. However, here's my quandary: each of these databases were originally created to track information regarding separate medical information, ie one looks at patients with eye disease, the other records info about patients with joint disorders, and the third details a specific group of patients' genetic information. I would guess that about half of these patients have some overlap and are in two or even all three of the databases, and unfortunately each database was created by separate medical researchers at different points in time, so the patient numbers do not match up between the databases (ie Jane Doe may be in 2 databases but her ID number is 223 in one and 394 in another). My task has been to merge all of this information into one spreadsheet that only lists each patient one time yet contains all of the information from all three of the databases (ie one row for Jane Doe that contains all of her eye disease info, her joint disease info, and her genetic info). I've figured out how to run duplicate queries based on the name and birthdate, and this shows me which patients are in more than one of the databases, but since each database has unique information I cannot just delete the other duplicate rows because in all actuality they aren't "duplicates" at all. The patient name and birthday is duplicate info, but the data is all unique. I have not been able to think of any possible way to successfully merge this information so that the remaining database only lists each patient one time yet still contains all of their medical info. I certainly don't mind having blank rows (ie in order to append all this info I had to combine the columns so that now a patient who did not have any eye disease will just have blanks in all of the eye disease columns but will have valuable data in the joint disease columns that follow). Any ideas? Thanks so much!