I've dabbled in a lot of PM and corrective data, both with fixed and variable frequency requirements and will say that for this, 11 date fields in a table is just not the way to go. The only difference between what I was working with and what you have is that for me, the frequency never changed. A basic requirement for you would be the last inspection date field and then a calculated due date. The difference between the due date and the executed date could provide for the percentage of work completed on time (can allow for a grace period if desired). I think in your case, if the count of PM executions is < 2 then the frequency is 3 months (if I understand what you've posted) else it is 6 months, up to a count of 11. Not sure why there's a cut-off point though, for surely it's possible that future economics could dictate that an asset doesn't get replaced after 5 years, or that a PM doesn't get performed because it is (e.g.) 2 weeks after the 5 year period.
Much of your information output is probably going to be best served up as reports rather than forms. Forms might expose data in a way that allows casual users to alter or even delete data.
The more we hear silence, the more we begin to think about our value in this universe.
Paraphrase of Professor Brian Cox.