If that is the way your source data is then IMO the first step is to normalize it. Since you would not be able to do this at the source, you'd have to link to it (as I presume you're already doing) then normalize it via UNION query into a second source table. However, seeing that you only provided one record it's impossible to be certain. If you ever had to add another meter and that forced you to add another field, then definitely it is in the wrong layout. I'm thinking more along the lines of (don't worry if I didn't match the meter value and meter number)
ReadDateID |
ReadDate |
Meter |
MeterRead |
1 |
6/7/2021 2:05 |
4 |
238.5 |
2 |
6/7/2021 2:05 |
2 |
384.2 |
3 |
6/7/2021 2:05 |
1 |
45.7 |
4 |
6/7/2021 2:05 |
3 |
854.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Your example layout is like a spreadsheet, which doesn't work well in Access.
The more we hear silence, the more we begin to think about our value in this universe.
Paraphrase of Professor Brian Cox.