Don't use multi value fields, they are a horrible, horrible, horrible addition to access and cause no end of grief. Apart from that I don't see any difference between the two, they are both in the same order.
I would really strongly suggest you try a more normalized structure to store these values.
I agree with rpeare, multi-value fields may seem like a convenience but they can be tricky to work with. However, I doubt what you want will be possible with a conventional structure either. A combobox is meant to list items in the dropdown and the multiple columns are to display fields of each record in the item list, not multiple records side-by-side. And the data stored in field cannot be configured for tabular display.
The multi-value field can be expanded in a query so each element is listed like a separate record, but not multi-columnar. Review: http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/ac...010149297.aspx
How to attach file: http://www.accessforums.net/showthread.php?t=70301 To provide db: copy, remove confidential data, run compact & repair, zip w/Windows Compression.
Rearrangement will be done For presentation (report) purposes? If so, you will need to create a table with field1 and field2. Then, divide the number of values with 2, and create a loop that will get the first value to record1, field1 then record2, field1 and so on. When reaching the result from the division, start same loop process with field2.
Report has page setup feature to display records in multi-column arrangement. Temp table and code not necessary.
How to attach file: http://www.accessforums.net/showthread.php?t=70301 To provide db: copy, remove confidential data, run compact & repair, zip w/Windows Compression.