I suppose, but I don't use arrays much. The method I've seen most commonly for the loop is using LBound and UBound, which automatically give you the upper and lower values of the array.
I suppose, but I don't use arrays much. The method I've seen most commonly for the loop is using LBound and UBound, which automatically give you the upper and lower values of the array.
That would make more sense to use LBound and UBound as opposed to having to just guess how many will be in the array. I'll google that to determine how to do it. Thanks again.
No problem. I'd still consider changing to SQL; that method strikes me as unnecessarily complicated.
I am beginning to agree with you. The more I am understanding the process of what needs to be done, it seems like the way that is set up is more steps than need to be.